Impeachment or Coup?
The impeachment agenda of Democrats is a political coup
-By Jenna Rives of The Hill
The impeachment narrative pushed by House Democrats needs to be called exactly what it is, which is a political coup. Contrary to what Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Chairman Adam Schiff, and progressive left wingers would have you believe, the United States still does have an objective rule of law, and the Constitution is not merely a guideline subject to interpretation and application at the whim of power grabs.
Regardless of whether you are a Republican, a Democrat, an independent, or anything else, it should concern all of us that the rule of law is being tossed out in favor of an open coup designed to undermine a free and fair election in the United States. Sheer partisan hatred toward an American president by the other party is not and has never been a sufficient legal or constitutional basis for impeachment. The Constitution specifically lays out “treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Political leverage or the inability to win elections are not listed. Read More....
Democrats opened the impeachment box, and they can’t close it.
The impeachment story begins in the heart of the Washington swamp. House Democrat Adam Schiff and his intelligence committee staff cooked up a carefully crafted “whistleblower” complaint with an anonymous CIA bureaucrat. In a gossipy document full of inaccuracies, the anonymous CIA guy alleged that, during a call with Ukraine’s newly elected President Volodymyr Zelensky, President Trump threatened military aid to Ukraine unless its government investigated Joe Biden. Read more....
Replace "Russian Collusion" and "Muller's Report will be the end of Trump" with "We've begun an Impeachment Inquiry" and it still adds up to Desperate Dems (and Rino Mitt Romney) inventing transgressions. Facts are already proving otherwise...again....
Adam Schiff: Poster Boy for Democrat Sleaze
Even though he had the actual transcript in front of him, "Sack of Schiff" (coined by Judge Janine) chose instead to read his own mafia-like version into official congressional records. Here's what this jerk said. You can listen to it at right to hear the dramatic, mafia don style reading, and then compare it to the actual transcript below.
"And what is the President’s response — well it reads like a classic organized crime shake down. In essence, what the President Trump communicates is this: We’ve been very good to your country. Very good. No other country has done as much as we have. But you know what, I don’t see much reciprocity here. You know what I mean? I hear what you want. I have a favor I want from you though. And I’m going to say this only seven times, so you better listen good. I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? Lots of dirt, on this and on that. I’m going to put you in touch with people, and not just any people. I’m going to put you in touch with the Attorney General of the United States — my Attorney General, Bill Barr — he’s got the whole weight of American law enforcement behind him. And I’m going to put you in touch with Rudy, you’re going to love him. Trust me. You know what I’m asking, so I’m only going to say this a few more times, in a few more ways. And don’t call me again. I’ll call you when you’ve done what I asked."
Here's The Federalist's take on this sleazy behavior. Read more....
Mitch McConnell told NPR last Friday that, if the House
impeaches President Trump, “the Senate immediately goes into a trial.” This is music to Democratic ears, despite the infinitesimal chance of conviction, because they desperately need the sordid spectacle into which impeachment trials inevitably devolve. The Senate, however, isn’t required to try the president. That chamber possesses the “sole power to try all impeachments,” but is under no constitutional obligation to do so. The Democrats ignored House precedent and longstanding tradition to launch their “impeachment inquiry.” Why should Senate Republicans consider themselves bound by precedent and procedural rules where the trial is concerned? Read more....
Senate Shouldn’t Dignify Impeachment Parody With a Trial
Bombshell revelation buried deep in CNN report unravels whistleblower scandal involving President Trump
"The whistleblower didn't have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower's concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration's determination that the complaint didn't fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said." Read More
Graham: Pentagon Review, Not Trump, Delayed Ukraine Aid
“The actual delay in aid was coming from the Pentagon as much as anybody else — because they didn’t know about the [Ukrainian] president and whether he could be trusted,” Graham told reporters Wednesday after reviewing the transcript of a discussion July 25 between the two leaders and referring to Zelensky, who had just won election.
“I’m glad the aid started flowing, so there is no quid pro quo,” he continued. “I feel good about this.” Read more....
After delving into the facts laid out in Solomon’s story, Levin reiterated that the recent hype and hysteria over Trump’s phone call is clearly an effort “to immunize Joe Biden, should he be the nominee in a general election, from this issue being raised.”
“Hunter Biden made a fortune” from his dealings in the “Ukrainian matter” and Trump told the Ukrainian president that “they need to look into this,” Levin concluded. “Why is that a scandal? They ought to look into it.”